Verified Document

Academy Awards: The Big Budget  Term Paper

Academy Awards: The Big (Budget) Picture

Hoffmann's (2005) article discusses whether or not a film's budget is any indicator of if it will win the prestigious Oscar Award for Best Picture. Recent mega-block busters like, Titanic, the Lord of the Rings: Return of the King, and Gladiator, at first glance seem to show a correlation of dollars spent to likelihood of Oscar success. However, further investigation finds otherwise.

According to Hoffmann (2005), the average cost of the Best Winner pictures, over the last 20 years, adjusted for inflation, is a scant $47.2 million. When this is compared to a median budget of only $41.7 million for the average film released, one begins to see that perhaps dollars don't count. In fact, some believe just the opposite.

Hoffmann (2005) quotes Russ Leatherman, Mr. Moviephone, as noting that Hollywood "likes to reward smaller dramas rather than large blockbusters." As an example, Driving Miss Daisy was the cheapest winner at only $24.1 million.

Some contend that the size of a movie's budget does not really matter, when it comes to the Oscars. Yet, looking at the movie industry from a financial perspective, one cannot help to notice that sometimes the returns are quite lucrative on smaller budget films. Miramax's the English Patient cost just $46.7 million and grossed more than $230 million worldwide, along with capturing the Best Picture Oscar (Hoffman, 2005). Examples like this are significant to the financial management field, as they prove that even in Hollywood, where substance often counts for little, it is the substance behind a film that often matters more than the dollars backing it. Bigger is not always better, as box office flop Waterworld and many others can attest to. This translates into a plethora of other industries and should be something that every financial management professional should remember.

References

Hoffmann, L. (16 Feb. 2005). Academy Awards: The big (budget) picture. Forbes.com. Retrieved February 28, 2005, at http://www.forbes.com/2005/02/16/ex_lh_0216oscarsprodcosts_print.html.

Article: Academy Awards: The Big (Budget) Picture

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Representation of Talent Looking at
Words: 1512 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

Critics and audiences are fascinated by how an actor interprets a formidable historical figure, bringing her or him to life on the big screen. Television actors have more leeway but the roles that earn actors awards tend to be quirky and unusual, such as Hugh Laurie in House, Alec Baldwin in 30 Rock, and America Ferrera in Ugly Betty. Will Ferrell and Jack Black may be correct about comedians not

Disney the Affect of Disney
Words: 1794 Length: 5 Document Type: Research Paper

Disney sets them up, sexes them up, and throws them under the bus when they come of age. But who is complaining? Very few. The fact is celebrity gossip has become an industry unto itself. People love watching stars fall. If Disney can provide the stars, people will watch. In summation, Disney Corps. has gone from Dumbo to just plain dumb. Yet, the park Walt Disney originated in 1955 holds

Motion Picture Industry the Relationship
Words: 4466 Length: 16 Document Type: Term Paper

Interestingly, results indicated that the three timing variables investigated, which were releases prior to long weekend, during summer, or during Christmas, did not demonstrate relation to total revenues (Simonoff & Sparrow, 2000). However, the third quartile grosses were noticeably higher for seasonal releases in comparison to non-seasonal releases (Simonoff & Sparrow, 2000). One of the most important factors involved in determining the success of a film in terms of box office

Promising Phenomenon That Lends Itself
Words: 26560 Length: 96 Document Type: Dissertation

66). Furthermore, social software will only increase in importance in helping organizations maintain and manage their domains of knowledge and information. When networks are enabled and flourish, their value to all users and to the organization increases as well. That increase in value is typically nonlinear, where some additions yield more than proportionate values to the organization (McCluskey and Korobow, 2009). Some of the key characteristics of social software applications

Neverending Story Wolfgang Petersen's 1984
Words: 3563 Length: 12 Document Type: Term Paper

However, critics complain that although the creatures created are fascinating as will be discussed later, the merging of special effects with the film itself is far from seamless. "Alas much of the effects work is considerably underset by thick matte lines - uncharacteristically poor work from Brian Johnson" (Scheib). Those thick matte lines are very visible at times during the film, particularly during the flying sequences when Flagor flies

Canada's Film Industry When Talking
Words: 4103 Length: 12 Document Type: Term Paper

Thus, the home market became an agora of diversity. Ethnic issues began to tell their stories through the voice of Srinivas Krishma who returned to her Indian roots in Masala (1991) or depicted the life of a Vietnamese refugee in Lulu (1996). Black people outlined their problems due to Rude (1995), or The Planet of Junior Brown (1997), directed by Clement Vigo, and Soul Survivor (1995), produced by Steven

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now